United States v. Keeda Haynes

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that even a four-page statement “is of no consequence if the defendant possessed additional information that she did not disclose to the [g]overnment”
• holding that as “the remand was limited to resentencing, the district court’s decision not to address the defendant’s argument regarding the jury instructions was proper”
• “Because there was substantial factual evidence on the record to support the district court’s decision not to grant a safety valve reduction, there was no clear error.”
• “Determinations by a Court of Appeals become the law of the case and are binding on both the district court on remand and the Court of Appeals on subsequent appeal.”
• “Determinations by a Court of Appeals become the law of the case and are binding on both the district court on remand and the Court of Appeals on subsequent appeal.”
• “Determinations by a Court of Appeals become the law of the case and are binding on both the district court on remand and the Court of Appeals upon subsequent appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).