United States v. Kearsley

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the allegations in a complaint must be complete enough to enable a reader to understand how each defendant was personally involved in the wrongdoing plaintiff is alleging
• holding that defendants “remained at risk and therefore cannot be a ‘prevailing party’ entitled to costs [or attorney's fees] under Rule 54(d)” where court granted plaintiff leave to amend its claims

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).