United States v. Keane Vallie

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the prosecutor’s question to the defendant about a prior unrelated offense was improper
• holding district court did not err in allowing trial observers to communicate with sequestered witnesses when there was “no evidence that any conversations between trial observers and sequestered witnesses resulted in tailored testimony or otherwise prejudiced” the defendant
• analyzing whether contact between trial observers and sequestered witnesses -6- violated sequestration order

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).