United States v. Kathy Mills Lee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that victims who suffered a monetary loss but eventually were reimbursed are “victims” for purposes of § 2Bl.l(b)(2)’s victim enhancement
• holding that persons can be counted as victims even if they were fully reimbursed for their losses as long as the losses were “neither short-lived nor immediately covered by third parties”
• “In none of these cases was there a third party available to provide prompt indemnification.”
• distinguishing Pendergraft and noting its policy concerns “were simply dicta”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).