· 11/14/1989
United States v. Kathy D. Hubbard
Citations
- 889 F.2d 277
- 281 U.S. App. D.C. 262
- 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 17188
- 1989 WL 135743
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- no plain error when there was virtually no risk jury was divided over object of conspiracy, since appellant was convicted of one underlying substantive offense, and all but one of alleged overt acts fell within same conceptual group
- no plain error when there was virtually no risk jury was divided over object of conspiracy, since appellant was convicted of one underlying substantive offense, and all but one of alleged overt acts fell within same conceptual group
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Buckley, Ginsburg, Sentelle
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.