Skip to main content
· 11/14/1989

United States v. Kathy D. Hubbard

Citations

  • 889 F.2d 277
  • 281 U.S. App. D.C. 262
  • 1989 U.S. App. LEXIS 17188
  • 1989 WL 135743

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • no plain error when there was virtually no risk jury was divided over object of conspiracy, since appellant was convicted of one underlying substantive offense, and all but one of alleged overt acts fell within same conceptual group
  • no plain error when there was virtually no risk jury was divided over object of conspiracy, since appellant was convicted of one underlying substantive offense, and all but one of alleged overt acts fell within same conceptual group

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Buckley, Ginsburg, Sentelle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.