United States v. Kathleen Tobin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that economic threats and other harassment were “within the purview of the Hobbs Act” because the victims “had a preexisting right to be free” from such threats
• concluding that economic threats and other harassment were “within the purview of the Hobbs Act” because the victims “had a preexisting right to be free” from such threats
• addressing threats of unrelated lawsuits and bad publicity from an individual angry at not being hired
• applying Enmons in the context of “labor-management conflicts” even before Brokerage Concepts
• refusing to entertain ineffective assistance of counsel claim on direct appeal
• considering defendant’s various “actions [that] went far beyond” hard bargaining

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).