· 11/27/2002
United States v. Kathleen J. Jacobsen
Citations
- 319 F.3d 323
- 52 F. App'x 5
- 52 Fed. Appx. 5
- 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 24234
- 2002 WL 31989395
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- ‘We agree with the district court that the right to redemption and protection from deficiency judgments are substantive rights.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Murphy, Beam, Melloy
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.