Skip to main content
· 12/19/2007

United States v. Katalinic

Citations

  • 510 F.3d 744
  • 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 29291
  • 2007 WL 4409798

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • discussing the amendment as it related to death-threat enhancements and concluding \[t]he Commission was presumably aware of the caselaw prohibiting death-threat adjustments in this context and tacitly approved the interpretation by not criticizing it\
  • discussing the amendment as it related to death‐threat enhancements and concluding “[t]he Commission was presumably aware of the caselaw prohibiting death‐threat adjustments in this context and tacitly approved the interpretation by not criticizing it”
  • \We choose to adopt the rule used by our sister circuits that death threats related to the firearm forming the basis of the § 924(c) sentence cannot be double counted by increasing the base offense level for the underlying crime.\
  • “We choose to adopt the rule used by our sister circuits that death threats related to the firearm forming the basis of the § 924(c) sentence cannot be double counted by increasing the base offense level for the underlying crime.”
  • noting the consistency with White

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Coffey, Evans, Sykes

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.