United States v. Karen Sypher

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “[t]he cumulative effect of errors that are harmless by themselves can” sometimes “be so prejudicial as to warrant a new trial”
• “Where, as here, no individual ruling has been shown to be erroneous, there is no ‘error’ to consider, and the cumulative error doctrine does not warrant reversal.” (quoting United States v. Deitz, 577 F.3d 672, 697 (6th Cir. 2009))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).