Skip to main content
· 1/18/1995

United States v. Karen Moutry

Citations

  • 46 F.3d 598
  • 1995 U.S. App. LEXIS 905

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • excluding time following reguest for new counsel where delay benefitted defendant despite lack of interests of justice finding
  • “[A]s the Speedy Trial Act specifically provides that continuity of counsel is an acceptable basis for an ‘ends of justice’ exclusion of time, we find the district court’s record acceptable regarding [the prosecuting attorney’s] absence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bauer, Kanne, Rovner

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.