United States v. Karen D. Thompson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• emphasizing that the hung jury after the first trial was “persuasive evidence that the district court’s error [in the second trial] affected the verdict,” and declining to find harmless error
• reasoning that a hung jury in a previous trial is persuasive evidence that the district court’s error affected the verdict in the second trial, where the jury convicted
• trial court committed prejudicial error when it precluded defendant from commenting on lack of fingerprint evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).