United States v. Kareem A. Nagib

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a hearsay statement qualified under Rule 804(b)(3) in part because there was “no record of any plea agreement or downward departure for cooperation” that could have called the declarant’s penal interest into question
• identifying the considerations as (1) the relationship between the confessing party and the exculpated party; (2) whether the confessor made a voluntary statement after being advised of his Miranda rights; and (3
• co-defendant Dumont made statement tending to show that he, and not Nagib, was responsible for shipping drugs

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).