· 2/10/2015
United States v. Kamal Patel
Citations
- 778 F.3d 607
- 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 2099
- 2015 WL 527549
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- disagreeing with the doctor’s argument that he could not be liable for kickbacks because the “patients independently chose [the provider]” given that he participated in a kickback scheme to sign referrals to that provider
- disagreeing with the doctor’s argument that he could not be liable for kickbacks because the “patient[s] independently chose a specific provider” given that he participated in a kickback scheme to sign referrals to that provider
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Flaum, Easterbrook, Kanne
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.