Skip to main content
· 2/10/2015

United States v. Kamal Patel

Citations

  • 778 F.3d 607
  • 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 2099
  • 2015 WL 527549

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • disagreeing with the doctor’s argument that he could not be liable for kickbacks because the “patients independently chose [the provider]” given that he participated in a kickback scheme to sign referrals to that provider
  • disagreeing with the doctor’s argument that he could not be liable for kickbacks because the “patient[s] independently chose a specific provider” given that he participated in a kickback scheme to sign referrals to that provider

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Flaum, Easterbrook, Kanne

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.