· 9/3/2014
United States v. Kamaal Mallory
Citations
- 765 F.3d 373
- 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 17228
- 2014 WL 4347198
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- defining dictum as a statement that “served no part in the analysis” and can be deleted without substantially impairing the opinion’s reasoning
- “[O]nce the officers had secured the premises and apprehended Mallory, the exigencies of the moment abated and the warrant requirement reattached.”
- listing the easily- obtainable-and-usable-firearm factor
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Fuentes, Fisher, Stark
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.