Skip to main content
· 9/3/2014

United States v. Kamaal Mallory

Citations

  • 765 F.3d 373
  • 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 17228
  • 2014 WL 4347198

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • defining dictum as a statement that “served no part in the analysis” and can be deleted without substantially impairing the opinion’s reasoning
  • “[O]nce the officers had secured the premises and apprehended Mallory, the exigencies of the moment abated and the warrant requirement reattached.”
  • listing the easily- obtainable-and-usable-firearm factor

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Fuentes, Fisher, Stark

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.