United States v. Kalymon

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the only requirement the rules impose “is that an expert submit a written report signed and prepared by the witness” and that the report contain a complete statement of all opinions to be expressed and the reasons therefor
• describing a district court’s discretion to admit or exclude expert testimony as “at its zenith during a 7 bench trial”
• there is “nothing nefarious” about a scenario where experts told counsel their substantive opinions and counsel reduced those opinions to writing for experts’ review and signature

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).