Skip to main content
· 5/3/1956

United States v. Kahl

Citations

  • 141 F. Supp. 161
  • 1956 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 3250

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “where the decision-making process itself is the subject of the litigation, it is inappropriate to allow the deliberative process privilege to preclude discovery of relevant information” (citation and quotations omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Picard

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.