United States v. Kadiri Apampa

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• applying crim- inal deadline to defendant’s appeal of forfeiture portion of sentence
• applying crim- inal deadline to defendant’s appeal of forfeiture portion of sentence
• “Nor did the fact that the district judge specified the punishment in two documents (one providing imprisonment and the other forfeiture) affect the time to appeal; this remains a ‘defendant’s’ appeal in ‘a criminal case’.”
• “[T]he core of a ‘criminal case’ to which Rule 4(b) applies is the sentence…. A forfeiture that constitutes part of the punishment in a criminal prosecu- tion is governed by Rule 4(b).”
• “[T]he core of a ‘criminal case’ to which Rule 4(b) applies is the sentence…. A forfeiture that constitutes part of the punishment in a criminal prosecu- tion is governed by Rule 4(b).”
• “Nor did the fact that the district judge specified the punishment in two documents (one providing imprisonment and the other forfeiture) affect the time to appeal; this remains a ‘defendant’s’ appeal in ‘a criminal case’.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).