United States v. Juvenile Male 1

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• denying motion to quash criminal defendant’s subpoena because, court could not permit “tribe’s immunity from civil actions” to “interfere] with the defendant’s right to compulsory process”
• holding in a proceeding to enforce a subpoena duces tecum issued under Rule 17(b) and (c) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure that \sovereign immunity from suit [lacks] any application to the enforcement of a federal subpoena on the custodian of records of a state or federal agency\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).