United States v. Jurado

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the allegation that a plaintiff “spoke with Defendant’s representatives ... negates a claim that the calls were made by an automated dialing system or artificial or prerecorded voice”
• granting motion to dismiss because the allegation that the plaintiff “spoke with Defendant’s representatives . . . negates a claim that the calls were made by an automated dialing system” and the plaintiff did not allege additional facts

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).