United States v. Jumper

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding harmless error where district court admitted portions of a video-taped interrogation during which the defendant invoked his right to remain silent
• finding harmless error where district court admit- ted portions of a video-taped interrogation during which the defendant invoked his right to remain silent
• finding district court abused discretion by allowing evidence of videotaped interrogation where defendant invoked right to remain silent in criminal prosecution
• noting court’s previous holding that “the right to remain silent ... attaches to a defendant’s refusal to answer a specific question, and therefore the Government may not comment on the defendant’s refusal to answer a specific question at trial” (emphasis added)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).