United States v. Julius Lawson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding the evidence was sufficient to show that the defendant possessed a firearm, even though the only evidence of firearm possession was a witness’s testimony and the witness conceded that the gun “could have been” a well-made replica
• showing an effect on substantial rights requires demonstrating that error “affected the outcome of the district court proceedings”
• lay witness testimony about gun’s appearance, along with testimony that possessor said “I have a gun,” sufficient to support jury conclusion that gun was real
• evidence disclosed mid-trial was not suppressed when the district court gave the defendant five days to review it
• lay witness testimony about gun’s appearance, along with testimony that possessor said “I have a gun,” sufficient to support jury conclusion that gun was real
• evidence disclosed mid-trial was not suppressed when the district court gave the defendant five days to review it

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).