Skip to main content
· 10/31/1973

United States v. Julius Doochin Enterprises, Inc.

Citations

  • 370 F. Supp. 942
  • 21 Wage & Hour Cas. (BNA) 346
  • 1973 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 11299

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “Thus, where disclosure has already been divulged, where disclosure is inevitable because the informer is to be a witness at trial (but note that this apparently must be proximate in time to the trial
  • “Thus, where disclosure has already been divulged, where disclosure is inevitable because the informer is to be a witness at trial (but note that this apparently must be proximate in time to the trial

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Gray

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.