United States v. Julio Larracuente

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• court correctly found pursuant to U.S.S.G. 2B5.3 that value of high quality \bootlegged\ videotapes was the same as the retail price of licensed copies
• where “unauthorized copies are prepared with sufficient quality to permit their distribution through normal retail outlets, the value of the infringing items is their normal retail price to ultimate consumers who purchase from such outlets”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).