United States v. Julio Cesar Ruiz, United States of America v. Angel Eliazar Noriega-Valenzuela

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that there was no testimony linking the defendant to the firearms seized
• “[T]he argument that ‘somebody must have possessed the weapons because they were there’ is insufficient evidence of control or intent to control the weapons by one or more identified individuals.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).