United States v. Julio Amezquito Acevedo, Also Known as Ramon Rodriguez, Also Known as Victor Gelarza

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that statute of limitations began to run when state department of correctional services sent first letter notifying INS of defendant’s incarceration
• holding that, despite arrest by New York State authorities in 1993 and 1994, statute of limitations for \found in\ offense did not begin to run until state correctional officials notified the INS of alien's incarceration in 1995
• holding that, despite arrest by New York State authorities in 1993 and 1994, statute of limitations for “found in” offense did not begin to run until state correctional officials notified the INS of alien’s incarceration in 1995
• explaining that, in the case of surreptitious reentry, the “found in” offense is first committed at the time of reentry
• holding statute of limitations begins to run when local law enforcement officials informed INS of defendant’s presence, not when defendant presented false identity papers upon entry
• rejecting defendant’s argument that immigration authorities were not diligent in discovering that his presence was unlawful where he did not even suggest that immigration authorities had ability to perform investigation he advocated

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).