United States v. Julia McMillon A/K/A Julia Walker, A/K/A Julia Bivens

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• evidence is admissible if it helps explain how the illegal relationship between the participants developed
• evidence which \explain[ed] to the jury how the illegal relationship between participants in the crime developed\ was admis- sible under Rules 404(b) and 403
• testimony by co-conspirators about defendant's drug dealing and drug deals with the co-conspirators -- some of which predated the charged con- spiracy by more than eight years -- was admissible under 404(b
• “[U]niform corporate policies will often bear heavily on 15 questions of predominance and superiority. . . . Such centralized rules, to the extent they reflect 16 the realities of the workplace, suggest a uniformity among employees that is susceptible to 17 common proof.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).