United States v. Juan Romero

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that “there was sufficient proof of the prior acts at issue because they were admitted through the testimony of Rivero, whose credibility was left to the jury”
• explaining that the third prong of the Rule 404(b) test is a “low threshold” and can be met by the testimony of just one witness
• holding a defendant has no constitutional or statutory right to attend a conference between the court and counsel to discuss jury instructions
• observing that the third prong of our Rule 404(b) test is a “low threshold”
• describing the third prong of the Rule 404(b) test as a “low threshold” that may be satisfied by the testimony of a single witness
• “Having found no error in the district court’s rulings, there is no cumulative error.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).