Skip to main content
· 2/18/2014

United States v. Juan Prado

Citations

  • 743 F.3d 248
  • 2014 WL 595771
  • 2014 U.S. App. LEXIS 2933

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • treating an objection as raised below when the government failed to argue forfeiture on appeal
  • treating an objection as raised below when the government failed to argue forfeiture on appeal
  • treating an objection as raised below when the government failed to argue forfeiture on appeal
  • “The district court’s statements at the sentencing hearing indicate that the court thought it lacked the discretion to consider dis- parities among defendants as a matter of law.”
  • “The district court’s statements at the sentencing hearing indicate that the court thought it lacked the discretion to consider dis- parities among defendants as a matter of law.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Easterbrook, Rovner, Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.