United States v. Juan Jose Pujana-Mena

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding no improper vouching where an agent “testified as to a general DEA policy regarding an informant’s veracity . . . after defense counsel had repeatedly suggested that [the agent] had not done enough to corroborate [the informant]’s information”
• summarizes treatment of character evidence in federal courts
• clarifying ʺseemingly contradictory rulings from this courtʺ

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).