United States v. Juan Hernandez-Ramirez, AKA Juan M. Hernandez

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that swearing to a false affidavit in an effort to obtain court-appointed counsel is \material\
• holding that swearing to a false affidavit in an effort to obtain court-appointed counsel is “material”
• holding that a false affidavit submitted to a magistrate judge was material whether or not it affected the judge’s decision
• holding that false information in the defendant’s financial affidavit was material because this information would tend to affect “whether the magistrate judge found him qualified for appointed counsel”
• noting that lack of candor toward judicial officers is regarded differently than lack of candor toward law enforcement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).