United States v. Juan Gabriel Dozal-Bencomo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing that subjective entrapment may only be found as a matter of law where the relevant facts are uncontradicted
• recognizing that entrapment as a matter of law may be found where it is unmistakable “that an otherwise innocent person was induced to commit the act” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)
• stating that a court “may find entrapment as a matter of law if the evidence satisfying the essential elements of entrapment is uncontradicted” (internal quotation marks and citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).