United States v. Juan Francisco Flores-Mireles

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that, despite a Rule 16 violation, the district court did not abuse its discretion by rejecting defendant’s request to exclude recorded statements made by the defendant
• explaining that the prosecution has no duty under Brady to disclose evidence \over which the prosecutor has no actual or constructive control\
• noting that neutral evidence does not fall under Brady
• finding no abuse of discretion where the district court declined to exclude statements despite a Rule 16 violation

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).