United States v. Juan Antonio Martinez (99-2025) Juan Armando Sauceda (99-2027)

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that challenge to constitutionality of § 841 \rests on an untenably broad and erroneous reading of Apprendi\
• explaining that improper vouching can stem from an implied guarantee of truthfulness based on facts outside the record
• explaining that improper vouching can stem from an implied guarantee of truthfulness based on facts outside the record, or from comments that imply that the prosecutor has special knowledge of facts not in front of the jury
• explaining that improper vouching can stem from an implied guarantee of truthfulness based on facts outside the record, or from comments that imply that the prosecutor has special knowledge of facts not in front of the jury
• explaining that improper vouching can stem from an implied guarantee of truthfulness based on facts outside the record, or from comments that imply that the prosecutor has special knowledge of facts not in front of the jury

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).