United States v. Juan A. Mata

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the presumption of vindictiveness did not arise, despite the fact that the remainder aggregate approach would have triggered it, because the facts did not show any “hint of vindictiveness”
• “[p]articularly in light of the fact that [the defendant’s] resentencing left him with an aggregate sentence four years less than that originally imposed, there is no basis for any inference of vindictiveness and therefore no due process violation”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).