United States v. Juan A. Flores

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that a “sentence could not be concurrent prior to the date it is pronounced, even if made concurrent with a sentence already being served”
• holding that a federal sentence cannot commence prior to the date it is announced, even if it is made concurrent with a sentence already being served
• holding “sentence could not be concurrent prior to the date it is pronounced, even if made concurrent with a sentence already being served.”
• “[The prisoner’s] appropriate remedy is under § 2255, not 28 U.S.C. § 2241, since the alleged errors occurred at or prior to sentencing.”
• “[A] federal sentence cannot commence prior to the date it is pronounced, even if made concurrent with a sentence already being served.”
• “[A] federal sentence cannot commence prior to the date it is pronounced, even if made concurrent with a sentence already being served.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).