Skip to main content
· 9/30/2002

United States v. J.R. Gonzales

Citations

  • 307 F.3d 906
  • 2002 Daily Journal DAR 11360
  • 59 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 399
  • 2002 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 9999
  • 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 20663
  • 2002 WL 31157972

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • sheets used to keep track of drug sales were non-hearsay since “not offered for the specific information conveyed by the 6 United States v. Holt, No. 02-0632/AF writings . . . but . . . for their significance as objects closely associated with the drug trade”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Hug, Cudahy, Tashima

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.