Skip to main content
· 10/9/2013

United States v. Joyce Ashcraft

Citations

  • 732 F.3d 860
  • 2013 WL 5539599
  • 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 20524

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that disability payments are “earnings” under the CCPA because the defendant 17 regularly received such payments through her employer as a substitute for wages or a salary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Loken, Melloy, Benton

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.