· 1/21/2016
United States v. Joshua Welch
Citations
- 811 F.3d 275
- 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 976
- 2016 WL 240775
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “At no point does [Welch] cite authority, cite to the record, or provide reasoning in support of this argument.”
- “[A Rule 41] procedural violation is not per se an unreasonable search and seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment.”
- “[A Rule 41] procedural violation is not per se an unreasonable search and seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment.”
- reviewing the NIT wax-rant at issue in Cot-tom’s case
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Riley, Beam, Kelly
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.