Skip to main content
· 1/21/2016

United States v. Joshua Welch

Citations

  • 811 F.3d 275
  • 2016 U.S. App. LEXIS 976
  • 2016 WL 240775

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “At no point does [Welch] cite authority, cite to the record, or provide reasoning in support of this argument.”
  • “[A Rule 41] procedural violation is not per se an unreasonable search and seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment.”
  • “[A Rule 41] procedural violation is not per se an unreasonable search and seizure in violation of the Fourth Amendment.”
  • reviewing the NIT wax-rant at issue in Cot-tom’s case

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Riley, Beam, Kelly

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.