United States v. Joshua Pillault

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the district court discussed the defendant’s work history and his disciplinary record as motivating its desire to protect the public
• holding a fact-specific explanation, consistent with the § 3553(a) factors, is sufficient to justify a sentence outside the Guidelines range
• affirming a sentence of 72 months’ though the top of the advisory Guidelines range was 24 months’
• affirming a sentence of 72 months’ though the top of the advisory Guidelines range was 24 months’
• evidence that defendant purchased materials to make a pipe bomb and had specific plans to carry out attack on particular high school on certain date sufficient to sustain enhancement

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).