United States v. Joshua Hollingsworth

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding the “issue in [Shepard] was not whether district courts could make findings about prior convictions, but simply what sources they could rely on to make such findings” (emphasis in original)
• “The determination that Hollingsworth’s prior convictions for multiple counts of aggravated assault and aggravated robbery included at least one crime of violence was thus squarely within the province of the sentencing judge.”
• reaffirming the holding and basic principles of Burgin
• reaffirming the holding and basic principles of Burgin

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).