United States v. Joshua Eaden

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting trial court is in the best position to weigh and assess witness credibility and conflicting evidence
• noting the superior court “is in the best position to judge the credibility of the witnesses, the weight of evidence, and also the reasonable inferences to be drawn therefrom”
• rejecting a claim of error in factual findings “since the evidence on this point was, at best, conflicting and we will not substitute our opinion for that of the trial court”
• superior court is in the best position to judge credibility of witnesses and resolve conflicting evidence, and appellate court generally defers to its findings
• “The trial court is in the best position to judge the credibility of the witnesses, the weight of evidence, and also the reasonable inferences to be drawn therefrom.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).