Skip to main content
· 9/12/1994

United States v. Joshua Carl Redman

Citations

  • 35 F.3d 437
  • 94 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7004
  • 94 Daily Journal DAR 12857
  • 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 24494
  • 1994 WL 487364

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • upholding district court’s abandonment of the commentary methodology when two crimes were distinct, and using the methodology would have resulted in fully concurrent sentence
  • court is required to consider sentencing methodology suggested in Guideline commentary
  • discussing the history and evolution of § 5G1.3

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Wright, Kozinski, Fernandez

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.