United States v. Joseph W. Rose, United States of America v. Michael Allen Peterson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that uncharged acts of money laundering may be considered in determining appropriate sentence under Sentencing Guidelines
• finding that uncharged acts of money laundering may be considered in determining appropriate sentence under Sentencing Guidelines
• affirming refusal to depart because of disparity between fraud and money laundering guidelines
• contending time spent in state custody should be credited 21 toward federal custody
• noting an extensive scheme that “involved approximately $3 million, sixty knowing or unwitting employees . . . , an untold but no doubt considerable number of bank employees and other outsiders, and scores of duped investors”
• “Whether criminal activity is ‘otherwise extensive’ depends on such factors as (i) the number of knowing participants and unwitting outsiders; (ii) the number' of victims; and (iii) the amount of money fraudulently obtained or laundered.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).