United States v. Joseph Tringali and Ramon Hernandez, A/K/A Alfredo

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that evidence of participation in cocaine conspiracy nine years earlier was admissible to show present knowledge and intent to distribute
• concluding that evidence of participation in a cocaine conspiracy nine years earlier was admissible to show present knowledge and intent to distribute
• concluding evidence within ten years was admissible to show present knowledge
• where notice under 21 U.S.C. § 851 was slightly deficient, contemporaneous 404(b) notice of same prior convictions supplied actual notice to defendant
• “Part of Hernandez’s defense was that he could not put a large drug deal together. The prior four-kilo transaction showed he had the knowledge and intent to do so.”
• 1984 cocaine trafficking conviction introduced at trial for drug deals in 1994

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).