Skip to main content
· 5/18/1998

United States v. Joseph Thomas Pearce

Citations

  • 146 F.3d 771
  • 1998 Colo. J. C.A.R. 2526
  • 1998 U.S. App. LEXIS 9857
  • 1998 WL 247951

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “[M]ost courts have held that Congress intended to require a certificate only in an appeal by an applicant for a writ.”
  • “We hold that the United States has the right to appeal a final order in a proceeding under § 2255 and need not obtain a certificate of appealability. Thus we have jurisdiction, and hence deny defendant’s motion to dismiss the government’s appeal.”
  • “We hold that the United States has the right to appeal a final order in a proceeding under § 2255 and need not obtain a certificate of appealability. Thus we have jurisdiction, and hence deny defendant’s motion to dismiss the government’s appeal.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Porfilio, Logan, Murphy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.