Skip to main content
· 4/28/2011

United States v. Joseph Swafford

Citations

  • 639 F.3d 265
  • 2011 U.S. App. LEXIS 8642
  • 2011 WL 1584344

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that an “unwarranted disparity” argument is an “unconventional ground for challenging a within-guidelines sentence” (emphasis omitted)
  • “[A] below-guidelines sentence . . . is more likely to create disparities than eliminate them.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Sutton, Kethledge, Hood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.