United States v. Joseph Stefan, Irvin Freedman, United States of America v. Irvin Freedman

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the omission of a one hour and forty-five minute bench conference, in such a “long and complex case,” was not a substantial or significant omission
• “We conclude that the district court, by failing to make a ruling, implicitly overruled ap- pellants’ objection and denied their motion for a mistrial.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).