· 4/1/1988
United States v. Joseph Samuel Kinsey, United States of America v. Albert Kinsey
Citations
- 843 F.2d 383
- 25 Fed. R. Serv. 523
- 1988 U.S. App. LEXIS 4062
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that because the evidence of the defendant's \guilt was so overwhelming and convincing that any error in the admission of [the detective's] testimony would be harmless beyond a reasonable doubt\
- expert properly testified that amount of cocaine found near defendant suggested an intent to distribute
- control and enforcement of drug abuse and drug trafficking fall within the scope of Congress' delegated powers
- “[A] ‘wide disparity’ between sentencing schemes of different jurisdictions does not violate equal protection, even where two persons who commit the same crime are subject to different sentences.”
- rejecting defendant’s identical eighth amendment claim
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Noonan, Thompson, Tevrizian
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.