United States v. Joseph Rovess Stines Durand Chaunce Ford Keith Maurice Phelan Kenneth Andrew Jefferson

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that when waiver predates relevant, intervening precedent, court may review waived issue because “[i]t would have been impossible for the defendant[] to have intentionally relinquished or abandoned” a right not recognized at the time of trial and sentencing

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).