United States v. Joseph R. Carneiro, Terry L. Johnson, George L. Ennis, Larry Emerson, Thomas Francis Begley, Willie Williams, Thomas J. Boyd

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that a subsequent wiretap application appeared to be “a word processor copy of the allegations” set forth in an initial wiretap application for an alleged co-conspirator
• noting that a subsequent wiretap application appeared to be \a word processor copy of the allegations\ set forth in an initial wiretap application for an alleged co-conspirator
• upholding wiretap order where the DEA used informants, surveillance, pen reg- isters and undercover agents before resorting to a wiretap
• noting, in the course of suppressing evidence obtained in a second wiretap, that agent’s affidavit submitted in support of wiretap “appears to be a word processor copy of the allegations he set forth” in application for previous wiretap
• affidavit met necessity requirement even though it included conclusory statement about difficulties in recruiting informants
• affidavit met necessity requirement even though it included conclusory statement about difficulties in recruiting informants

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).